Musculoskeletal injuries in office workers

Lesiones osteomusculares en trabajadores de oficina

 

Raúl González-Salas

ua.raulgonzalez@uniandes.edu.ec

Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes. UNIANDES, Ambato – Ecuador

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8418-2849

 

 

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to determine the main musculoskeletal complaints of office workers. A quantitative, descriptive approach with a non-experimental design was used. The population consisted of 37 workers. The prevalence of musculoskeletal discomfort was analyzed according to different anatomical segments, resulting in 77% referred to the neck, followed by discomfort in the right shoulder with 48.31%, followed by lumbar discomfort with 35.48%, being considerable to generate ergonomic actions with the aim of preserving the health of workers. It was evidenced that 83.78% of the workers present some musculoskeletal symptoms. Seventy-seven percent reported cervical discomfort, followed by discomfort in the right shoulder 48.3% and discomfort in the dorsal or lumbar spine 35.48%.

Descriptors: systems of medicine; sensory systems; ergonomics. (Source: UNESCO Thesaurus).

 

RESUMEN.

El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo determinar las principales molestias osteomusculares que presentan los trabajadores de una oficina. Se utilizó un enfoque cuantitativo, de tipo descriptivo con diseño no experimental. La población estuvo conformada por 37 trabajadores. Se analizó la prevalencia de molestias osteomusculares de acuerdo con diferentes segmentos anatómicos teniendo como resultado 77% referida en el cuello, seguida de las molestias en hombro derecho con el 48.31%, seguida de molestias lumbares con el 35.48% siendo considerable generar acciones ergonómicas con la finalidad de preservar la salud de los trabajadores. Se evidenció que el 83.78% de los trabajadores presentan algún síntoma osteomuscular. El 77% refirió molestia cervical, seguida de molestia en hombro derecho 48.3% y molestia en columna dorsal o lumbar 35.48%

Descriptores: sistema médico; sistema sensorial; ergonomía. (Fuente: Tesauro UNESCO).

 

 

 

Received: 09/16/2022. Revised: 23/09/2022. Approved: 08/10/2022. Published: 01/01/2023.

Research articles section


INTRODUCTION

Musculoskeletal disorders are affections of structures such as muscles, tendons, joints, ligaments, nerves, cartilage, bones, vascular system, which are produced by activities in the work environment (Tišlar, et al. 2022); therefore, musculoskeletal injuries appear when exposure to mechanical stress that exceed the load capacity of the structures of the locomotor system. These injuries are classified as acute and chronic. Acute injuries are the result of brief and intense effort causing functional and structural failure of anatomical segments such as muscle tears or fractures. Chronic injuries are long-lasting and are caused by permanent efforts, producing pain and dysfunction that increases over time, such as ligament tears or muscle spasm (Balderas-López, et al. 2019).

In this sense; musculoskeletal disorders are related to work incapacity, within which rotator cuff tendinitis, bursitis, carpal tunnel syndrome, Quervain's tenosynovitis, lateral and medial epicondylitis, nonspecific low back pain, among others, are more prevalent (Sánchez-Medina, 2018). These injuries are sometimes difficult to diagnose because in most cases the only manifestation is pain, which is a subjective sensation, so it is necessary to analyze the working conditions to which the worker is exposed.

Therefore; repetitive movements and forced postures are among the most important risk factors for developing musculoskeletal injuries in different anatomical regions of the human body, which causes pain, discomfort and in many cases can generate musculoskeletal pathology which can lead to work incapacity and repercussions in the productivity of the company (Namwongsa, et al. 2018). In consideration, Repetitive movements and forced postures are among the most important risk factors for developing musculoskeletal injuries in different anatomical regions of the human body, which causes pain, discomfort and in many cases can generate musculoskeletal pathology which can lead to work incapacity and repercussions in the productivity of the company (Hoe, et al. 2018), (Arman, 2020), (Depreli, & Angın, 2018).

The present work aims to determine the main musculoskeletal complaints presented by workers in an office.

METHOD

This study used a quantitative, descriptive approach with a non-experimental design. The population consisted of 37 workers of the Credit and Savings Cooperative "Credi YA", head office located in the city of Ambato, Ecuador. Being a finite population of less than 100 people, no sample calculation was made, therefore, the total universe planned for the study was used.

The Nordic Kuorinka questionnaire, first published in 1987, was used as an instrument to detect initial musculoskeletal symptoms, and information was collected on pain, fatigue, and discomfort in different anatomical areas. The questionnaire consists of multiple-choice questions about musculoskeletal symptoms that the worker frequently presents in the workplace (Leirós-Rodríguez, et al. 2020). The strength of this instrument is that it can be used to study musculoskeletal complaints related to dynamic, static work and forced postures (Martínez, & Alvarado-Muñoz, 2017), (González-Muñoz, 2021), (Castro-García, et al. 2021).

For the analysis of results, the distribution of frequencies and percentages of positive cases of musculoskeletal complaints related to the different variables was used.

RESULTS

The 51.35% corresponds to the female gender, while 46.64% corresponds to the male gender. The age group 51.35% were between 18 and 30 years of age. 59.45% had an employment relationship of more than 12 months at the time of the present study.

Of the total number of respondents, 31 participants (83.78%) reported discomfort or pain in some body segment, while 16.21% reported no discomfort at all.

Of the 31 participants who presented pain, 77% reported cervical discomfort, followed by discomfort in the right shoulder 48.3% and discomfort in the dorsal or lumbar spine 35.48%.

The duration of the pain was observed that 41.93% presented pain in an interval of 1 to 24 hours, followed by 35.48% who presented discomfort with a duration of less than 1 hour, while 16.12% maintained the discomfort from 1 to 7 days. 

In reference to pain treatment, only 22.58% said they had received some type of treatment or medical attention, while 77.41% had not received treatment.

The vast majority 80.64% stated that the discomfort was related to the design of the workstation, while 19.35% stated that the discomfort was caused by extra-occupational activities.

Regarding the level of knowledge of preventive measures, it was found that 70.27% were unaware of these measures, while 29.72% had some knowledge of prevention of musculoskeletal injuries.

 

Table 1. Presence of musculoskeletal complaints in relation to the variables.

 

Tipo de variable

 

Presenta dolor

 

SI

 

NO

 

TOTAL

 

Valor de P, X

 

V. EDAD

18-30 años

16

3

19

 

P: 0.59

X: 1.1

31-40 años

11

3

14

>40 años

4

0

4

TOTAL

31

6

37

 

V. GENERO

Femenino

18

1

19

 

P: 0.06

X: 3.4

Masculino

13

5

18

TOTAL

31

6

37

 

V.TIEMPO DE TRABAJO

2-6 meses

8

1

9

 

P: 0.89

X: 0.2

7-12 meses

5

1

6

>12 meses

18

4

22

TOTAL

31

6

37

 

 

 

V. AREA LABORAL

A. Administrativa

 

5

 

0

 

5

 

 

 

 

P: 0.23

X: 4.3

A. Finanzas y Contabilidad

 

10

 

1

 

11

A. Marketing y Negociaciones

 

12

 

5

 

17

A. Seguridad y Mantenimiento

 

4

 

0

 

4

TOTAL

31

6

37

 

V. CONOCIMIENTO

Si conoce

7

4

11

 

P: 0.03

X: 4.7

No conoce

24

2

26

TOTAL

31

6

37

Source: Own elaboration.

 

 

 

Table 1 presents a statistical analysis by calculating the p-value and chi-square in which it was determined that the variables: age, gender, work time and work area are not statistically significant, suggesting that they are not related to the appearance of musculoskeletal symptoms. While the variable knowledge of preventive measures rejects the null hypothesis, i.e. that it is directly related to the appearance of musculoskeletal symptoms.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DISCUSSION

In the current research it was evidenced that 83.78% of the workers present some musculoskeletal symptom, this leads to think about the study of (Leirós-Rodríguez, et al. 2020), where a reduction in the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain was identified (p < 0.001) in the sample of men and women, an increase (12.5%) in the frequency of performing moderate to frequent physical activity and the preference for strength training (15.1% ), especially among women. All this may be taken into account by health institutions when implementing measures to promote physical activity, both in adequate amounts and types, to improve the quality of life of students; being considerable to apply in office workers, a physical activity program as part of the prevention of musculoskeletal discomfort.

In contrast, the sample of the current work, presents in 77% of its participants pain at the cervical level, this agrees with the study of (Seo, et al. 2022), who state that neck pain is associated with computer work, poor posture, imbalance of the neck muscles and fatigue, particularly in office workers. This involves the need to generate ergonomic actions in order to preserve the health of workers.

In continuation of the above, (Yaghoubitajani, et al. 2022), evaluated the effects of supervised online versus on-site corrective exercises on neck and shoulder pain (NSP), sick leave, posture, workability and muscle activity among office workers with upper cross syndrome (UCS), concluding that supervised online corrective exercise appears to improve a variety of parameters related to work performance. These findings are very applicable in light of the current pandemic of COVID; many workers have to work from home; this involves the possibility of proposing this strategy as an alternative for the prevention of musculoskeletal discomfort, especially when the current results show that 70.27% of workers surveyed do not have knowledge of preventive measures for musculoskeletal injuries, which was directly related to the occurrence of musculoskeletal symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of musculoskeletal discomfort was analyzed according to different anatomical segments, resulting in 77% referred to the neck, followed by discomfort in the right shoulder with 48.31%, followed by lumbar discomfort with 35.48%, being considerable to generate ergonomic actions with the purpose of preserving the health of the workers. It was evidenced that 83.78% of the workers present some musculoskeletal symptoms. Seventy-seven percent reported cervical discomfort, followed by discomfort in the right shoulder 48.3% and discomfort in the dorsal or lumbar spine 35.48%.

FINANCING

Non-monetary

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

There is no conflict of interest with persons or institutions related to the research.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes. UNIANDES, Ambato - Ecuador.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REFERENCES

Arman, Sina. (2020). Are ergonomic interventions effective for prevention of upper extremity work-related musculoskeletal disorders among office workers? A Cochrane Review summary with commentary. Musculoskeletal science & practice45, 102062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2019.102062

Balderas-López, Maribel, Zamora-Macorra, Mireya, & Martínez-Alcántara, Susana. (2019). Trastornos musculoesqueléticos en trabajadores de la manufactura de neumáticos, análisis del proceso de trabajo y riesgo de la actividad [Musculoskeletic disorders in workers of tire manufacturing: analysis of the work process and risk of the activity]. Acta universitaria29, e1913. https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2019.1913

Castro-García, Sebastián, Yandún-Burbano, Edison, Freire-Constante, Luis, & Albán-Álvarez, Mayra. (2021). Gestión del talento humano: Diagnóstico y sintomatología de trastornos musculoesqueléticos evidenciados a través del Cuestionario Nórdico de Kuorinka [Human talent management: Diagnosis and symptomatology of musculoskeletal disorders evidenced through the Kuorinka Nordic Questionnaire]. INNOVA Research Journal6(1), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v6.n1.2021.1583

Depreli, Ö., & Angın, E. (2018). Review of scapular movement disorders among office workers having ergonomic risk. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation31(2), 371–380. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-170790

González-Muñoz, Elvia. (2021). Estudio de validez y confiabilidad del cuestionario nórdico estandarizado, para detección de síntomas musculoesqueléticos en población mexicana [Validity and reliability study of the standardized Nordic questionnaire for the detection of musculoskeletal symptoms in the Mexican population]. Ergonomía, Investigación Y Desarrollo3(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.29393/EID3-1EVEG10001

Hoe, Víctor, Urquhart, Donna, Kelsall, Helen, Zamri, Eva, & Sim, Malcolm. (2018). Ergonomic interventions for preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb and neck among office workers. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews10(10), CD008570. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008570.pub3

Leirós-Rodríguez, Raquel, Rodríguez-Nogueira, Óscar, Pinto-Carral, Arrate., Álvarez-Álvarez, María-José, Galán-Martín, Miguel, Montero-Cuadrado, Federico, & Benítez-Andrades, José. (2020). Musculoskeletal Pain and Non-Classroom Teaching in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of the Impact on Students from Two Spanish Universities. Journal of clinical medicine9(12), 4053. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124053

Martínez, Marta & Alvarado-Muñoz, Rubén. (2017). Validación del cuestionario Nórdico estandarizado de síntomas musculoesqueléticos para la población trabajadora chilena, adicionando una escala de dolor [Validation of the standardized Nordic questionnaire of musculoskeletal symptoms for the Chilean working population, adding a pain scale]. Revista De Salud Pública21(2), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.31052/1853.1180.v21.n2.16889

Namwongsa, Suwalee, Puntumetakul, Rungthip, Neubert, Manida, Chaiklieng, Swangnetr, & Boucaut, Rose. (2018). Ergonomic risk assessment of smartphone users using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) tool. PloS one13(8), e0203394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203394

Sánchez-Medina, Andrés Felipe. (2018). Prevalencia de desórdenes músculo esqueléticos en trabajadores de una empresa de comercio de productos farmacéuticos [Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in workers of a pharmaceutical products trading company]. Revista Ciencias de la Salud16(2), 203-218. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.6766

Seo, Jongmin, Song, Changho, & Shin, Doochul. (2022). A Single-Center Study Comparing the Effects of Thoracic Spine Manipulation vs Mobility Exercises in 26 Office Workers with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research28, e937316. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.937316

Tišlar, Marina, Starc, Gregor, & Kukec, Andreja. (2022). Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Physiotherapists and Physiotherapy Students in Croatia and their Association with Physical Fitness. Zdravstveno varstvo61(3), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2022-0023

Yaghoubitajani, Zohreh, Gheitasi, Mehdi, Bayattork, Mohammad, & Andersen, Louis. (2022). Corrective exercises administered online vs at the workplace for pain and function in the office workers with upper crossed syndrome: randomized controlled trial. International archives of occupational and environmental health95(8), 1703–1718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01859-3

 

Bajo la Licencia Creative Commons 4.0 de Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0