Musculoskeletal injuries in office workers
Lesiones osteomusculares en trabajadores de oficina
Raúl González-Salas
ua.raulgonzalez@uniandes.edu.ec
Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes. UNIANDES,
Ambato – Ecuador
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8418-2849
ABSTRACT
The
aim of this study was to determine the main musculoskeletal complaints of
office workers. A quantitative, descriptive approach with a non-experimental
design was used. The population consisted of 37 workers. The prevalence of
musculoskeletal discomfort was analyzed according to different anatomical
segments, resulting in 77% referred to the neck, followed by discomfort in the
right shoulder with 48.31%, followed by lumbar discomfort with 35.48%, being
considerable to generate ergonomic actions with the aim of preserving the
health of workers. It was evidenced that 83.78% of the workers present some
musculoskeletal symptoms. Seventy-seven percent reported cervical discomfort,
followed by discomfort in the right shoulder 48.3% and discomfort in the dorsal
or lumbar spine 35.48%.
Descriptors: systems of
medicine; sensory
systems; ergonomics. (Source:
UNESCO Thesaurus).
RESUMEN.
El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo determinar las principales
molestias osteomusculares que presentan los trabajadores de una oficina. Se utilizó un enfoque cuantitativo, de tipo
descriptivo con diseño no experimental. La población estuvo conformada por 37
trabajadores. Se analizó la prevalencia de molestias osteomusculares de acuerdo
con diferentes segmentos anatómicos teniendo como resultado 77% referida en el
cuello, seguida de las molestias en hombro derecho con el 48.31%, seguida de
molestias lumbares con el 35.48% siendo considerable generar acciones
ergonómicas con la finalidad de preservar la salud de los trabajadores. Se
evidenció que el 83.78% de los trabajadores presentan algún síntoma
osteomuscular. El 77% refirió molestia cervical, seguida de molestia en hombro
derecho 48.3% y molestia en columna dorsal o lumbar 35.48%
Descriptores: sistema médico; sistema sensorial; ergonomía. (Fuente: Tesauro UNESCO).
Research articles
section
INTRODUCTION
Musculoskeletal disorders are affections of
structures such as muscles, tendons, joints, ligaments, nerves, cartilage,
bones, vascular system, which are produced by activities in the work
environment (Tišlar, et al. 2022); therefore,
musculoskeletal injuries appear when exposure to mechanical stress that exceed
the load capacity of the structures of the locomotor system. These injuries are
classified as acute and chronic. Acute injuries are the result of brief and
intense effort causing functional and structural failure of anatomical segments
such as muscle tears or fractures. Chronic injuries are long-lasting and are
caused by permanent efforts, producing pain and dysfunction that increases over
time, such as ligament tears or muscle spasm (Balderas-López, et al.
2019).
In this sense; musculoskeletal disorders are related
to work incapacity, within which rotator cuff tendinitis, bursitis, carpal
tunnel syndrome, Quervain's tenosynovitis, lateral
and medial epicondylitis, nonspecific low back pain, among others, are more
prevalent (Sánchez-Medina, 2018). These injuries are sometimes difficult to
diagnose because in most cases the only manifestation is pain, which is a subjective
sensation, so it is necessary to analyze the working conditions to which the
worker is exposed.
Therefore; repetitive movements and forced postures
are among the most important risk factors for developing musculoskeletal
injuries in different anatomical regions of the human body, which causes pain,
discomfort and in many cases can generate musculoskeletal pathology which can
lead to work incapacity and repercussions in the productivity of the company (Namwongsa, et al. 2018). In consideration, Repetitive
movements and forced postures are among the most important risk factors for
developing musculoskeletal injuries in different anatomical regions of the
human body, which causes pain, discomfort and in many cases can generate
musculoskeletal pathology which can lead to work incapacity and repercussions
in the productivity of the company (Hoe, et al. 2018), (Arman, 2020), (Depreli, & Angın, 2018).
The present work aims to determine the main
musculoskeletal complaints presented by workers in an office.
METHOD
This study used a quantitative, descriptive approach
with a non-experimental design. The population consisted of 37 workers of the
Credit and Savings Cooperative "Credi YA", head office located in the
city of Ambato, Ecuador. Being a finite population of less than 100 people, no
sample calculation was made, therefore, the total universe planned for the
study was used.
The Nordic Kuorinka questionnaire, first published
in 1987, was used as an instrument to detect initial musculoskeletal symptoms,
and information was collected on pain, fatigue, and discomfort in different
anatomical areas. The questionnaire consists of multiple-choice questions about
musculoskeletal symptoms that the worker frequently presents in the workplace (Leirós-Rodríguez, et al. 2020). The strength of this
instrument is that it can be used to study musculoskeletal complaints related
to dynamic, static work and forced postures (Martínez, & Alvarado-Muñoz,
2017), (González-Muñoz, 2021), (Castro-García, et al. 2021).
For the analysis of results, the distribution of
frequencies and percentages of positive cases of musculoskeletal complaints
related to the different variables was used.
RESULTS
The 51.35% corresponds to the female gender, while
46.64% corresponds to the male gender. The age group 51.35% were between 18 and
30 years of age. 59.45% had an employment relationship of more than 12 months
at the time of the present study.
Of the total number of respondents, 31 participants
(83.78%) reported discomfort or pain in some body segment, while 16.21%
reported no discomfort at all.
Of the 31 participants who presented pain, 77%
reported cervical discomfort, followed by discomfort in the right shoulder
48.3% and discomfort in the dorsal or lumbar spine 35.48%.
The duration of the pain was observed that 41.93%
presented pain in an interval of 1 to 24 hours, followed by 35.48% who
presented discomfort with a duration of less than 1 hour, while 16.12%
maintained the discomfort from 1 to 7 days.
In reference to pain treatment, only 22.58% said
they had received some type of treatment or medical attention, while 77.41% had
not received treatment.
The vast majority 80.64% stated that the discomfort
was related to the design of the workstation, while 19.35% stated that the
discomfort was caused by extra-occupational activities.
Regarding the level of knowledge of preventive
measures, it was found that 70.27% were unaware of these measures, while 29.72%
had some knowledge of prevention of musculoskeletal injuries.
Table 1. Presence of musculoskeletal complaints in
relation to the variables.
Tipo de variable |
Presenta dolor |
SI |
NO |
TOTAL |
Valor de P, X |
V. EDAD |
18-30 años |
16 |
3 |
19 |
P: 0.59 X: 1.1 |
31-40 años |
11 |
3 |
14 |
||
>40 años |
4 |
0 |
4 |
||
TOTAL |
31 |
6 |
37 |
||
V. GENERO |
Femenino |
18 |
1 |
19 |
P: 0.06 X: 3.4 |
Masculino |
13 |
5 |
18 |
||
TOTAL |
31 |
6 |
37 |
||
V.TIEMPO DE TRABAJO |
2-6 meses |
8 |
1 |
9 |
P: 0.89 X: 0.2 |
7-12 meses |
5 |
1 |
6 |
||
>12 meses |
18 |
4 |
22 |
||
TOTAL |
31 |
6 |
37 |
||
V. AREA LABORAL |
A. Administrativa |
5 |
0 |
5 |
P: 0.23 X: 4.3 |
A. Finanzas y
Contabilidad |
10 |
1 |
11 |
||
A. Marketing y
Negociaciones |
12 |
5 |
17 |
||
A. Seguridad y
Mantenimiento |
4 |
0 |
4 |
||
TOTAL |
31 |
6 |
37 |
||
V. CONOCIMIENTO |
Si conoce |
7 |
4 |
11 |
P: 0.03 X: 4.7 |
No conoce |
24 |
2 |
26 |
||
TOTAL |
31 |
6 |
37 |
Source: Own
elaboration.
Table 1 presents a statistical
analysis by calculating the p-value and chi-square in which it was determined
that the variables: age, gender, work time and work area are not statistically
significant, suggesting that they are not related to the appearance of
musculoskeletal symptoms. While the variable knowledge of preventive measures
rejects the null hypothesis, i.e. that it is directly related to the appearance
of musculoskeletal symptoms.
DISCUSSION
In the current research it was
evidenced that 83.78% of the workers present some musculoskeletal symptom, this
leads to think about the study of (Leirós-Rodríguez,
et al. 2020), where a reduction in the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain was
identified (p < 0.001) in the sample of men and women, an increase (12.5%)
in the frequency of performing moderate to frequent physical activity and the
preference for strength training (15.1% ), especially among women. All this may
be taken into account by health institutions when implementing measures to
promote physical activity, both in adequate amounts and types, to improve the
quality of life of students; being considerable to apply in office workers, a
physical activity program as part of the prevention of musculoskeletal
discomfort.
In contrast, the sample of the
current work, presents in 77% of its participants pain at the cervical level,
this agrees with the study of (Seo, et al. 2022), who state that neck pain is
associated with computer work, poor posture, imbalance of the neck muscles and
fatigue, particularly in office workers. This involves the need to generate
ergonomic actions in order to preserve the health of workers.
In continuation of the above,
(Yaghoubitajani, et al. 2022), evaluated the effects
of supervised online versus on-site corrective exercises on neck and shoulder
pain (NSP), sick leave, posture, workability and muscle activity among office
workers with upper cross syndrome (UCS), concluding that supervised online
corrective exercise appears to improve a variety of parameters related to work
performance. These findings are very applicable in light of the current
pandemic of COVID; many workers have to work from home; this involves the
possibility of proposing this strategy as an alternative for the prevention of
musculoskeletal discomfort, especially when the current results show that
70.27% of workers surveyed do not have knowledge of preventive measures for
musculoskeletal injuries, which was directly related to the occurrence of
musculoskeletal symptoms.
CONCLUSION
The prevalence of musculoskeletal discomfort was
analyzed according to different anatomical segments, resulting in 77% referred
to the neck, followed by discomfort in the right shoulder with 48.31%, followed
by lumbar discomfort with 35.48%, being considerable to generate ergonomic
actions with the purpose of preserving the health of the workers. It was
evidenced that 83.78% of the workers present some musculoskeletal symptoms.
Seventy-seven percent reported cervical discomfort, followed by discomfort in
the right shoulder 48.3% and discomfort in the dorsal or lumbar spine 35.48%.
FINANCING
Non-monetary
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
There is no conflict of interest with persons or
institutions related to the research.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Universidad
Regional Autónoma de Los Andes. UNIANDES, Ambato - Ecuador.
REFERENCES
Arman, Sina. (2020). Are ergonomic interventions effective
for prevention of upper extremity work-related musculoskeletal disorders among
office workers? A Cochrane Review summary with commentary. Musculoskeletal
science & practice, 45, 102062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2019.102062
Balderas-López,
Maribel, Zamora-Macorra, Mireya, & Martínez-Alcántara, Susana. (2019).
Trastornos musculoesqueléticos en trabajadores de la manufactura de neumáticos,
análisis del proceso de trabajo y riesgo de la actividad [Musculoskeletic
disorders in workers of tire manufacturing: analysis of the work process and
risk of the activity]. Acta
universitaria, 29, e1913. https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2019.1913
Castro-García,
Sebastián, Yandún-Burbano, Edison, Freire-Constante, Luis, & Albán-Álvarez,
Mayra. (2021). Gestión del talento humano: Diagnóstico y sintomatología de
trastornos musculoesqueléticos evidenciados a través del Cuestionario Nórdico
de Kuorinka [Human talent management: Diagnosis and symptomatology of
musculoskeletal disorders evidenced through the Kuorinka Nordic
Questionnaire]. INNOVA Research Journal, 6(1), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v6.n1.2021.1583
Depreli,
Ö., & Angın, E. (2018). Review of scapular movement disorders among office
workers having ergonomic risk. Journal of back and
musculoskeletal rehabilitation, 31(2), 371–380. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-170790
González-Muñoz, Elvia.
(2021). Estudio de validez y confiabilidad del cuestionario nórdico
estandarizado, para detección de síntomas musculoesqueléticos en población
mexicana [Validity and reliability study of the standardized Nordic
questionnaire for the detection of musculoskeletal symptoms in the Mexican
population]. Ergonomía,
Investigación Y Desarrollo, 3(1),
8-17. https://doi.org/10.29393/EID3-1EVEG10001
Hoe, Víctor, Urquhart, Donna, Kelsall, Helen, Zamri, Eva, & Sim, Malcolm. (2018). Ergonomic
interventions for preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the
upper limb and neck among office workers. The Cochrane database of
systematic reviews, 10(10), CD008570. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008570.pub3
Leirós-Rodríguez,
Raquel, Rodríguez-Nogueira, Óscar, Pinto-Carral, Arrate., Álvarez-Álvarez,
María-José, Galán-Martín, Miguel, Montero-Cuadrado, Federico, &
Benítez-Andrades, José. (2020). Musculoskeletal Pain and Non-Classroom
Teaching in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of the Impact on Students
from Two Spanish Universities. Journal of clinical medicine, 9(12), 4053. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124053
Martínez, Marta &
Alvarado-Muñoz, Rubén. (2017). Validación del cuestionario Nórdico
estandarizado de síntomas musculoesqueléticos para la población trabajadora
chilena, adicionando una escala de dolor [Validation of the standardized Nordic
questionnaire of musculoskeletal symptoms for the Chilean working population,
adding a pain scale]. Revista De Salud Pública, 21(2), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.31052/1853.1180.v21.n2.16889
Namwongsa, Suwalee, Puntumetakul,
Rungthip, Neubert, Manida, Chaiklieng, Swangnetr, & Boucaut, Rose. (2018). Ergonomic risk assessment of
smartphone users using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) tool. PloS one, 13(8), e0203394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203394
Sánchez-Medina, Andrés
Felipe. (2018). Prevalencia de desórdenes músculo esqueléticos en trabajadores
de una empresa de comercio de productos farmacéuticos [Prevalence of
musculoskeletal disorders in workers of a pharmaceutical products trading
company]. Revista Ciencias de la Salud, 16(2), 203-218. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.6766
Seo,
Jongmin, Song, Changho, & Shin, Doochul. (2022). A Single-Center Study
Comparing the Effects of Thoracic Spine Manipulation vs Mobility Exercises in
26 Office Workers with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical
Study. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental
and clinical research, 28, e937316. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.937316
Tišlar,
Marina, Starc, Gregor, & Kukec, Andreja. (2022). Work-related
Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Physiotherapists and Physiotherapy Students in
Croatia and their Association with Physical Fitness. Zdravstveno
varstvo, 61(3), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2022-0023
Yaghoubitajani,
Zohreh, Gheitasi, Mehdi, Bayattork, Mohammad, & Andersen, Louis. (2022).
Corrective exercises administered online vs at the workplace for pain and
function in the office workers with upper crossed syndrome: randomized
controlled trial. International
archives of occupational and environmental health, 95(8), 1703–1718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01859-3
Bajo la Licencia Creative Commons 4.0
de Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0